We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: NSU-9 Liberal bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Neo-Idealist Social Lodamese Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4754
Description[?]:
Furthering social liberal values is deemed important. Here is a bill to further liberalize the country: |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forced marriages.
Old value:: The legality of forced marriages lies with local governments.
Current: Forced marriages are illegal.
Proposed: Forced marriages are illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Local governments determine the legality of crossdressing.
Current: Crossdressing is allowed.
Proposed: Crossdressing is allowed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning immigration.
Old value:: No foreigners are permitted to reside permanently in this nation.
Current: Everyone is allowed to reside permanently in this nation.
Proposed: Everyone is allowed to reside permanently in this nation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:25:56, May 10, 2020 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the NSU-9 Liberal bill |
Message | Mr. Speaker, While we believe the government has no right in preventing people from living however they so choose, Article 2 extends too far for us to accept this proposal. If Article 2 was to be changed to "Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications", then we would accept this bill with all its parts. However, we will abstain from this vote for now. Milan Grbić, Liberty Party MP |
Date | 22:38:11, May 10, 2020 CET | From | Neo-Idealist Social Lodamese Party | To | Debating the NSU-9 Liberal bill |
Message | Mr Speaker, So much for liberty! The party of fake leaders, who cant agree because it is not meeting their economic calculus. They agree to give "freedom" as much as it profits them, as soon as it turns out that genuine fight for freedom is needed they reject, they care more on how well they will do, wont stand truly for human rights, they will gladly deny residence to some people because their not helping them economically. Chairman of the NSU, Jacob Patel |
Date | 23:06:20, May 10, 2020 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the NSU-9 Liberal bill |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Our colleagues of the NSU simply do not understand that Lodamun cannot afford to simply accept all peoples into our nation. This is simply a tactic to ensure that the demographic change in our nation will benefit their party, while we are concerned about the welfare of our people and ensuring that our standards of living are not dragged down by an influx of immigrants. Milan Grbić, Liberty Party MP |
Date | 10:40:51, May 11, 2020 CET | From | Neo-Idealist Social Lodamese Party | To | Debating the NSU-9 Liberal bill |
Message | Mr Speaker, It's not like the country will be flooded with people. The economy is down and got a bad reputation for being a slave-state for 100 years or more, for sure nobody is highly interested to be here. Plus they still need to work even if the requirements are not saying that, In order to survive you have to work, which translates to workforce. So we advise you to vote yes if you truly uphold liberties and not just float around getting excuses for your actions. Chairman of NSU, Oscar Gayoso |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 161 | ||
no | Total Seats: 237 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 201 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "Politics is perhaps the only profession for which no preparation is thought necessary." - Robert Louis Stevenson |