We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2215
Description[?]:
An act to criminalise the theft of property by the government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: The victim of eminent domain sets compensation, government can appeal to the courts if they deem the cost too high.
Current: The victim of eminent domain sets compensation, government can appeal to the courts if they deem the cost too high.
Proposed: The victim of eminent domain determines just compensation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:18:46, April 16, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Act |
Message | There can NEVER be a case for taking someones property without their permission. Government is of the people BY the people FOR the people. Theft is wrong and if a governemt resorts to theft it no longer has the moral right to govern! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 52 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 85 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 193 |
Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
Random quote: "Let's call the drug war what it is, ethnic cleansing of Americans." - Jello Biafra |