We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Advancement Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Institutional Revolutionary Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4762
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Current: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Proposed: The military acts as a de-facto police force, with powers of arrest.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:54:29, May 26, 2020 CET | From | Socialists People’s Party | To | Debating the Military Advancement Bill |
Message | Disagree. We can’t allow possible engines to have are weapons. They could fall into the hands of terrorist. |
Date | 23:55:00, May 26, 2020 CET | From | Socialists People’s Party | To | Debating the Military Advancement Bill |
Message | Enemies* not engines. |
Date | 23:55:37, May 26, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Military Advancement Bill |
Message | No, and how does an engine get a weapon? |
Date | 00:00:36, May 27, 2020 CET | From | Libertarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Military Advancement Bill |
Message | the LNP supports 1 but not 2 |
Date | 00:47:05, May 27, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Military Advancement Bill |
Message | NO |
Date | 04:06:45, May 27, 2020 CET | From | Socialists People’s Party | To | Debating the Military Advancement Bill |
Message | CRP I meant ENEMY |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes | Total Seats: 19 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 81 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
Random quote: "In Germany they first came for the Communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me--and by that time no one was left to speak up." - Pastor Martin Niemoller |