We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police in Likatonia Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Socialists People’s Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4763
Description[?]:
| PLA |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Current: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:55:30, May 27, 2020 CET | From | Libertarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Police in Likatonia Act |
| Message | we agree with this proposal |
| Date | 02:20:32, May 27, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Police in Likatonia Act |
| Message | We agree |
| Date | 14:02:04, May 27, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Police in Likatonia Act |
| Message | we would agree |
| Date | 17:43:15, May 27, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the Police in Likatonia Act |
| Message | We dissagre with this because of uncertanty of what defines serious emergencies, that could be even large non-violent protest against government. |
| Date | 17:55:50, May 27, 2020 CET | From | The Moderates | To | Debating the Police in Likatonia Act |
| Message | We will agree but only if "serious emergencies" are clearly defined and don't mean control of dissidents |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 42 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 58 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Liberalism is the transformation of mankind into cattle." - Friedrich Nietzsche |