Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:41:00
Server time: 04:18:59, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom II

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2218

Description[?]:

free advertising

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:57:26, April 18, 2006 CET
From BigBoss Party
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageDIsargee.
Some advertising will be inappropiate, and some even may be disturbing.
if we allow anything to be published, then the negatives and wrongs can come out.

Date02:22:24, April 19, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageIf the advertisements really are innaproprate, people will not listen to them.

You see, WE will allow anything to get published, but people will not.

Date04:56:03, April 19, 2006 CET
From BigBoss Party
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageIf the advertisements really are innaproprate, people will not listen to them.

then the people will do what?
COMPLAIN about the advertising constantly present(o and lets not forget our young children, and the immature people)
Who will they complain to
THE GOVERNMENT(thats us)
Think about the future.

Date13:57:35, April 19, 2006 CET
From Socialists Fury
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageThen what is the point of passing a bill that will allow any type of advertising, when you say "WE will allow anything to get published, but people will not." Freedom of choice is a big deal however but if we leave interpretation of freedom of choice wide open like this, it is bound to lead to some disturbance for some people from advertisements.

Date02:05:03, April 20, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageI am thinking about the future. It will take time, but eventually, standards will set in.

SF, this is freedom. People decide things, not government. True, the government is a representation of the people, but like a poll, it is not always accurate. That is a Republic. A Democracy is where all the people chose together. This is Democracy.

Besides that, the fewer things the government does, the better. The government is fairly inefficient at everything it does; that is its nature.

Date02:06:20, April 20, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Freedom II
Message"Besides that, the fewer things the government does, the better. The government is fairly inefficient at everything it does; that is its nature." A perfect example is the Soviets. Remember that they no longer exist.

Date02:38:32, April 20, 2006 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageAt first we wanted to support this...

But the Citizens Party is concerned mainly about children in this matter. We do not believe in advertising to children because it (inappropriately) transforms them into consumers of mass culture at too young an age. Some standards should be expected right?

Date05:16:25, April 20, 2006 CET
From BigBoss Party
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageHear hear citizens party

Date23:53:38, April 20, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageC's P, I do agree with you. But are the children ours, or the parents'? This will actually give parents, if confronted with advertising too innapropriate, to teach their kids right and wrong. That is the purpose of a parent, no?

Date00:56:12, April 22, 2006 CET
From BigBoss Party
ToDebating the Freedom II
Messagein a way they are our children and their parents

they are our (country) future, some the future leaders, so we must also help to teach them wrong and right.
old saying:
we(humans) never stop learning.


Date01:39:08, April 22, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageSooooo.... Force our opinions on them??? No. The parents decide how to teach their own kids. That is why I put up the bill privatizing schools.

Date01:58:02, April 22, 2006 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageFor some reason, we want to support this, but we concerned about children. Conservatives: you have a chance to try to convince us...

Date02:23:49, April 22, 2006 CET
From BigBoss Party
ToDebating the Freedom II
Messageyou know citizens party, i was the same way(support and all) when i continued to think about it.
but there is no convincing argument.
we are hear to protect our children and like i said in a previous bill, if Conservative Party cant accept their duties as Head of State and a member of the legis. branch, then maybe its time for them to resign.

Date15:20:33, April 22, 2006 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageThanks BBP. I'm voting against this.

Date19:47:12, April 22, 2006 CET
From Jelbék Zemojad Lofrkad Prta
ToDebating the Freedom II
MessageThis is awful. The DLP await the fall of the Conservative party and the chance to undo all that it has done.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 253

no
    

Total Seats: 372

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats.

Random quote: "Anarchy is the true nature of all things. Monarchy, democracy, communism, all useless forms to control the human mind. But a mind cannot be controlled. It cannot be restrained. It has no boundaries. It has its will. Anarchy is the true nature of all things." - Alex Battig

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76