Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 02:10:08
Server time: 05:49:51, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ADM Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: RP: Action in Response to Kalopian Developments

Details

Submitted by[?]: Demokratik Ittifak 🐺

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4777

Description[?]:

Legislation in response to Kalopia's deeply destabilising political developments.

Article 1:- The Jakanian government unequivocally condemns the "National Reforms" bill (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=627373) currently set to pass in the Kalopian legislature.

Article 2:- No trade in goods or services with Kalopia may be conducted by the Jakanian government or by businesses registered in Jakania while the current Kalopian policies of segregation persist.

Article 3:- The Jakanian government will take special measures to relax restrictions on Kalopian citizens fleeing the country in response to the policies of the Kalopian government and expedite their settlement however possible.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:36:23, June 29, 2020 CET
FromKalopian Ulusal Partisi
ToDebating the RP: Action in Response to Kalopian Developments
MessageKalopia must be allowed to exercise its right to self governance, even though legislature attempts to holt such rights.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 164

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
 

Total Seats: 136


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "I have come to the conclusion that politics are too serious a matter to be left to the politicians." - Charles de Gaulle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37