Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:06:09
Server time: 19:53:50, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2217

Description[?]:

We should look into certain areas of our legislation to effectivate our population, not giving them so many risktaking choices. The more decisions you have to make, the bigger risk you have of doing the wrong decisions.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:00:09, April 19, 2006 CET
FromDeltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill)
MessageNo to article 2 and 4. Don't like article 1 but would let it go through with article 3.

Date14:18:03, April 19, 2006 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill)
MessageNo. The only point we may consider is article 3, but we couldn't support the others on any grounds.

Date16:37:46, April 19, 2006 CET
FromUnion Party
ToDebating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill)
MessageThe Union party can not in any way accept any of these articles, thus it is a very obvious conclusion that we will be voting no on this bill independant of any finagling as long as the articles present are included. We might be bloody red economically, but we believe strongly in liberty for one's personal behavior. Is it any wonder that half our seats are held by weirdos, some with amazingly funny hats and or walks?

Date18:38:41, April 19, 2006 CET
FromNational Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill)
MessageNo to all, with the possible exception of 3 (if a less extreme option was taken). It is not the government's place to legislate morality. That can only come from within.

Date11:30:48, April 20, 2006 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill)
Message4 nos

Date21:42:45, April 20, 2006 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill)
MessageNAY! on all.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 48

no
       

Total Seats: 339

abstain
 

Total Seats: 13


Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

Random quote: "A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar." - H. L. Mencken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 87