We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2217
Description[?]:
We should look into certain areas of our legislation to effectivate our population, not giving them so many risktaking choices. The more decisions you have to make, the bigger risk you have of doing the wrong decisions. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Everyone may adopt children.
Proposed: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Proposed: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Current: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Proposed: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Homosexual relations are illegal, but are not prosecuted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:00:09, April 19, 2006 CET | From | Deltarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill) |
Message | No to article 2 and 4. Don't like article 1 but would let it go through with article 3. |
Date | 14:18:03, April 19, 2006 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill) |
Message | No. The only point we may consider is article 3, but we couldn't support the others on any grounds. |
Date | 16:37:46, April 19, 2006 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill) |
Message | The Union party can not in any way accept any of these articles, thus it is a very obvious conclusion that we will be voting no on this bill independant of any finagling as long as the articles present are included. We might be bloody red economically, but we believe strongly in liberty for one's personal behavior. Is it any wonder that half our seats are held by weirdos, some with amazingly funny hats and or walks? |
Date | 18:38:41, April 19, 2006 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill) |
Message | No to all, with the possible exception of 3 (if a less extreme option was taken). It is not the government's place to legislate morality. That can only come from within. |
Date | 11:30:48, April 20, 2006 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill) |
Message | 4 nos |
Date | 21:42:45, April 20, 2006 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Living for the bigger purpose bill (aka morality bill) |
Message | NAY! on all. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes | Total Seats: 48 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 339 | |||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 13 |
Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
Random quote: "A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar." - H. L. Mencken |