Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 02:54:12
Server time: 01:05:47, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dnobb | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Re-Ministerialising Malivia

Details

Submitted by[?]: Ministerial Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2220

Description[?]:

It's time to return Malivia to his former glory...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:42:42, April 25, 2006 CET
FromMalivianese Militarist Party
ToDebating the Re-Ministerialising Malivia
MessageYou know the Protectorates are going to come here and say there is a limit to 4 proposals per bill?

Date23:04:47, April 25, 2006 CET
FromMinisterial Party
ToDebating the Re-Ministerialising Malivia
MessageYes well, it's our first bill back - and a little reset for the ideology bars. The Protectorate's have always moaned about us, we don't mind putting up with it a bit more :)

Date23:36:27, April 25, 2006 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Re-Ministerialising Malivia
MessageWell have fun everyone will abstain from your illegal bill. Divide it up or abstain we shall.

Date23:38:31, April 25, 2006 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Re-Ministerialising Malivia
MessageActually keep it I'll just vote no.

But you still need to follow the rules. Yes Protectorate can be a jerk sometimes and we don't need a 2nd one either.

Date17:25:42, April 26, 2006 CET
FromMinisterial Party
ToDebating the Re-Ministerialising Malivia
MessageThis'll be it actually... just need to get re-settled. Anyway, I was expecting it to be voted down... just need to re-set my ideology bars. Also, all bills help my election chances... Would you rather this or 20 mini-versions?

Date18:37:18, April 26, 2006 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Re-Ministerialising Malivia
Message20 mini versions or 5 versions max. That fits within the laws here. If you can't play by the rules go be a jerk elsewhere. Like I said we don't need a 2nd one.

Date23:36:56, April 26, 2006 CET
FromMalivianese Militarist Party
ToDebating the Re-Ministerialising Malivia
MessageSince we agree with most of the proposals, we can vote yes.

Date23:56:47, April 26, 2006 CET
FromFree Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Re-Ministerialising Malivia
MessageSerious response from the FPA; This is funny.

Date05:38:40, April 30, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Re-Ministerialising Malivia
MessageWell back. As usual with no regards for the rules we have set up.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 124

no
    

Total Seats: 177

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols.

Random quote: "He who controls the past, commands the future. He who commands the future, conquers the past." - Kane; Command and Conquer: Red Alert

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 160