We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: P.d.l 06/4861 Climate & Ecological policy amendments
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partito Democratico Nazionale ðŸ’
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4862
Description[?]:
| We propose following very important proposals to the Assembly. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Current: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Proposed: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Current: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Policy on climate change
Old value:: The government has no official position on climate change.
Current: The official government position is that the climate is not changing.
Proposed: The official government position is that climate change is one of the most important problems of our day and constitutes a global emergency. We have to take drastic measures to stop it.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:55:27, December 15, 2020 CET | From | Forum Conservatore Nazionale | To | Debating the P.d.l 06/4861 Climate & Ecological policy amendments |
| Message | Extreme centrilazation for a non-issue. How can any party support this? Let people live their lives! |
| Date | 23:47:40, December 15, 2020 CET | From | Sinistra Ecologista | To | Debating the P.d.l 06/4861 Climate & Ecological policy amendments |
| Message | Curious how ecology is deemed as a non-issue, but what people in the army do in their beds is a national security issue! "How can any straight man support this? Let people live their lives!" Just like spending so much money for weapons, when our last armed conflict (an interventionist conflict in another country) ended almost 226 years ago! This is what happens when upper-class istalian men try to decide for our country. - Claudia Lupo (SE) |
| Date | 07:33:48, December 16, 2020 CET | From | Partito Nazionale Istaliano | To | Debating the P.d.l 06/4861 Climate & Ecological policy amendments |
| Message | It is a non-issue as the SE defines it. The PNI is as always concerned concerning the environment. But as there is no reason at all to panic. To my party, things are going just perfectly and there is no signs that alarms us to consider supporting this bill. Maria Umborti |
| Date | 14:55:21, December 16, 2020 CET | From | Sinistra Ecologista | To | Debating the P.d.l 06/4861 Climate & Ecological policy amendments |
| Message | Dear mrs Umborti, I personally believe the aim of this bill is exactly to avoid panic in the immediate future: that's why we balieve this law should pass: an ecological breakdown can cause way more panic than the measures needed to avoid it. Rising sea level and desertification means that if we don't start acting now, vast parts of Istalia and Majatra would be ungabitable in the future. Internal mass migrations and extreme weather events are the ones that can cause panic among our citizens, not a law to protect our forests. That would actually make people less anxious, because they will see we are acting against ecological issues and that we will prevent many disasters to happen -Claudia Lupo (SE) |
| Date | 18:10:13, December 16, 2020 CET | From | Partito Nazionale Istaliano | To | Debating the P.d.l 06/4861 Climate & Ecological policy amendments |
| Message | But......mrs Lupo, where is the evidence of all these catastrophes you are telling us about ? Your party is predicting disasters only and trying to cause fear among our citizens. Irresponsible behaviour, I call that attitude. Maria Umborti |
| Date | 22:47:50, December 16, 2020 CET | From | Sinistra Ecologista | To | Debating the P.d.l 06/4861 Climate & Ecological policy amendments |
| Message | I would ask mrs Umborti to carefully read the last reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of the World Congress. This analyses just climate change, and not other factors such as biodiversity loss or the scarcity of natural resources. Scientists all around Terra are describing catastrophical schenaries that could happen if we don't take actions and our citizens, which are not stupid nor missinformed, know about these warnings, and your impossibility to tell the truth is the thing that's irresponsible and that's causing fear, expecially among younger generations who live in fear of getting a dying world from their predecessors -C. Lupo |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 284 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 339 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 58 |
| Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "Once again, we will wage war against fascism, only this time a civil war of words and politics." - Vladimir Borisov, former Trigunian politician |