We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Security Council Seat Proposed Change Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hizb Muasisiun
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4862
Description[?]:
| Would cease to abstain on Seat D. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nomination for Security Council Seat D. (For more information, see )
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453http
Old value:: Abstain
Current: Lourenne
Proposed: Abstain
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:06:51, December 14, 2020 CET | From |  Hizb Muasisiun | To | Debating the Security Council Seat Proposed Change Bill |
| Message | This was solicited by Dankuk, We are favorably inclined but asked about when intervention is justified and maintaining a permanent military force. |
| Date | 23:33:56, December 14, 2020 CET | From | Hizb Muasisiun | To | Debating the Security Council Seat Proposed Change Bill |
| Message | This was response. Convinced me. Dear Minister Duqaq, Thank you for your timely response. Please allow me to respond to your questions: 1. Any potential actions undertaken by the Security Council must be measured against the Guiding Principles and the Declaration of Natural Human Rights. The Security Council, as a body bound by international law, is prohibited from interfering in the affairs of sovereign states on matters that do not concern international peace and security. Thus, the only time the Security Council can—and in our view, should authorize military action is under circumstances wherein the activities of a nation threaten the peace and security of the international community. For instance, such a threat could included a verifiable genocide, or the initiation of hostilities between two state parties (i.e. an invasion of another sovereign nation). 2. The Security Council already has, in a sense, a permanent military force as represented by the World Congress Peacekeeping Office. Our view is that this is the only standing force the World Congress should maintain. We intend, further, to reform this body to make it more accountable and strictly limit its mandate to peacekeeping and observatory missions (i.e. to prohibit SC regime change interventions). We intend to restructure the funding formula such that nations are no longer required to pay a flat fee to the WCPO. This is regressive and disproportionately affects the finances of developing countries. Please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions or concerns. Best wishes, Ms. Bae Yoo-bin Deputy Premier of Dankuk Minister of Foreign Affairs Chairwoman of the Ecology Movement |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes |
Total Seats: 240 | |
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |
| abstain |
Total Seats: 210 |
| Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
| Random quote: "Men who have greatness in them don't go in for politics." - Albert Camus |