We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Divorce Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2224
Description[?]:
| Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it. If there's adultry or violence involved, it already has gotten too far, thus we propose this as an alternative. We also believe marriages should be able to disbanded when both partners agree, avoiding nasty divorce battles.. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Divorces are only legal with grounded cause (such as adultery, or violence).
Current: Only divorces that comply with religious doctrine are legal.
Proposed: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:42:04, April 27, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Divorce Bill |
| Message | If there's adultry or violence involved, it already has gotten too far, thus we propose this as an alternative. We also believe marriages should be able to disbanded when both partners agree, avoiding nasty divorce battles.. |
| Date | 15:58:46, April 27, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Divorce Bill |
| Message | Opposed. |
| Date | 22:57:26, April 29, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Divorce Bill |
| Message | Opposed as well. |
| Date | 00:28:06, April 30, 2006 CET | From | Atlas | To | Debating the Divorce Bill |
| Message | We support the GLDS fully. |
| Date | 23:20:28, April 30, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Divorce Bill |
| Message | thank you |
| Date | 19:14:36, May 01, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Divorce Bill |
| Message | This will open the flood gates for divorce if it is approved. Marriage is a sacred institution. That is why we have the divorce law that we have now. |
| Date | 23:27:20, May 01, 2006 CET | From | Atlas | To | Debating the Divorce Bill |
| Message | Sacred ? We are talking c i v i l contracts. Religious objections are completely irrelevant. |
| Date | 23:55:47, May 01, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Divorce Bill |
| Message | We oppose this measure. This will erode family values and leave us with to many single parents. The current law is fine. |
| Date | 09:45:10, May 02, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Divorce Bill |
| Message | I think I'ld rather have a single parent family than two parents who can't stand each other living together, no? |
| Date | 14:47:40, May 08, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Divorce Bill |
| Message | oppose. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 211 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 288 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation. |
| Random quote: "If it were proved to me that in making war, my ideal had a chance of being realized, I would still say 'No' to war, for one does not create human society on mounds of corpses." - Louis Lecoin |