We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Justice Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Beginnings
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4907
Description[?]:
| The government's policy towards police presence. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Police searches.
Old value:: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or have reasonable grounds to suspect that a crime was committed.
Current: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or in cases of imminent danger.
Proposed: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or in cases of imminent danger.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards police presence.
Old value:: The police patrol public property at all times.
Current: The police patrol public property at all times.
Proposed: The police do not actively patrol public property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:14:57, March 13, 2021 CET | From |  Democracy Freedom Party | To | Debating the Justice Reform Act |
| Message | DIsagree with article 1 only, Everyone should have their right to have a jury. It is an excellent way to ensure all people can have a fair trial and provide a chance to allow people to know more about justice and they can have a chance to protect the independence of justicry |
| Date | 16:49:37, March 13, 2021 CET | From | New Beginnings | To | Debating the Justice Reform Act |
| Message | Rather trail by jury allows a judgment to rely on "emotion" rather than on "reason." The jurors never can be fully independent and impartial and can have the deep and rich knowledge of the law that a judge does and is required to produce and fair and impartial judgment. |
| Date | 02:14:18, March 14, 2021 CET | From | Democracy Freedom Party | To | Debating the Justice Reform Act |
| Message | disagree, Juries are groups of people sworn to render a verdict in court based on the evidentiary facts presented to them. , they will just decide the case base on the evidence and the fact. You said that allows the jury to join the trial, the judge will just reply on 'emotion' rather than 'reason', but please remember, the judge is still a human , they may also reply on 'emotion' rather than 'reason'.If we want to make sure the trial is base on 'reason' rather than 'emotion' , you should find an AI or a robot to be a judge |
| Date | 02:25:32, March 14, 2021 CET | From | Democracy Freedom Party | To | Debating the Justice Reform Act |
| Message | then allow a judgment with the judge may be sound more dangerous than the jury, the justice that the power of can has the deep and rich knowledge of the law is just base on a one-man,(the judge), But we allow the jury , the power that can have the deep and rich knowledge of the law can be separated to the group of people. It is no doubt that if we want to have an independent justice system, we have to make sure courts enforce the law and resolve disputes without regard to the power and preferences of the parties appearing before them, but we also need to make sure the system is suitable for our country and the law is also suitable for us. |
| Date | 23:45:30, March 15, 2021 CET | From | Democracy Freedom Party | To | Debating the Justice Reform Act |
| Message | thank for delete it |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 151 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 99 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
| Random quote: "John Burroughs has stated that experimental study of animals in captivity is absolutely useless. Their character, their habits, their appetites undergo a complete transformation when torn from their soil in field and forest. With human nature caged in a narrow space, whipped daily into submission, how can we speak of its potentialities?" - Emma Goldman |