We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Projet de loi communiste 18 : Politique energique
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alliance Communiste Pro-Vie
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4911
Description[?]:
We all need energy, and we need to be certain this energy comes from clean sources. the only way to do is complete nationalization of the energy compagnies.. Presented by Rachelle Soleil-Lalune, leader of the of PLCA |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Current: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Proposed: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:48:30, March 24, 2021 CET | From | Rassemblement Républicain de Rildanor | To | Debating the Projet de loi communiste 18 : Politique energique |
Message | Our liberal and conservative values push us to reject this text as a whole, which also proposes to transform our society into a communist dictatorship where it would be impossible to undertake. Paul Saint-Simon Representative of the Republican Conventionists |
Date | 15:43:05, March 24, 2021 CET | From | Alliance Communiste Pro-Vie | To | Debating the Projet de loi communiste 18 : Politique energique |
Message | Our party would never dream of establishing a communist dictatorship. we ask that Mr Saint-Simon stop using using strawman attack against us. Rachelle Soleil-Lalune, leader of the of PLCA |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 182 | ||
no | Total Seats: 224 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 49 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "No government has the right to tell its citizens when or whom to love. The only queer people are those who don't love anybody." - Rita Mae Brown |