We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Infrastructure Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: 천국연합 ☸️ Spiritual Center
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4969
Description[?]:
Might Danseon bless and protect all travellers! As minister for transport and infrastructure I would like to propose the following: First, all highways should be run by the state. The thing is that burdening the costs on local state organs is unfair since it decreases the local budget for streets everyone can use. It is more balancing the interests when the central state takes care of this. Second, abolishing private train companies. It is more efficient for the traffic flow when everything is tacted by one big public company. So the train plan times are fitting better, so that you do not have to wait for too long when getting the next train in a row. Also it will prevent speculation with the public need of transportation. It will be a catalyst for the speed of transport to the work place and elsewhere. Gim San San Minister for Infrastructure and Transport |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Train Operating Companies (TOC).
Old value:: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Current: Private companies operate regional TOC's. The national service is provided by a publicly owned, national TOC.
Proposed: There is a single publicly owned TOC.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy in respect to highways.
Old value:: There is a national highway system constructed and maintained by the national government, and local systems by local governments.
Current: A national highway infrastructure is constructed and maintained by the government.
Proposed: A national highway infrastructure is constructed and maintained by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:19:38, July 18, 2021 CET | From | ☯ DPDP ☯ | To | Debating the National Infrastructure Reform |
Message | Is Article II really necessary? Surely there's room for small TOCs as well |
Date | 19:27:38, July 18, 2021 CET | From | 천국연합 ☸️ Spiritual Center | To | Debating the National Infrastructure Reform |
Message | In the end they just prevent a railroad traffic organization on maximum efficiency over our entire state. This comes from the issue with having different types of ownership. Infrastructure is more essential than running schools by small private non-profit organizations. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 402 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 342 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 6 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
Random quote: "You can't give the government the power to do good without also giving it the power to do bad, in fact, to do anything it wants." - Harry Browne |