We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: [OOC: RP DISCUSSION]The Union of Luthorian Hosian Churches purchases a medieval monastery in the outskirts of Fort William, plans to restore it to a functioning monastery for use for Churches and ULHC
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union of Luthorian Hosian Churches
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4975
Description[?]:
| Would anyone oppose this? It would be benefitial for my personal roleplay around the Hosian churches and could act as the party headquarters at the same time. If anyone has any objections or additions into this, please voice them here. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:26:48, July 30, 2021 CET | From | Agrarian Populist Party | To | Debating the [OOC: RP DISCUSSION]The Union of Luthorian Hosian Churches purchases a medieval monastery in the outskirts of Fort William, plans to restore it to a functioning monastery for use for Churches and ULHC |
| Message | I support it happening OOCly, but my party would take issue with it as we would see the defunct monastery as part of Luthori's shared religious-cultural heritage that should be held in common. The APP would support some agreement by which the government retains ownership but ULHC maintains and uses the monastery. |
| Date | 00:53:51, July 30, 2021 CET | From | Union of Luthorian Hosian Churches | To | Debating the [OOC: RP DISCUSSION]The Union of Luthorian Hosian Churches purchases a medieval monastery in the outskirts of Fort William, plans to restore it to a functioning monastery for use for Churches and ULHC |
| Message | That doesn't really make sense to me. What difference does it make that who owns it? Besides, government's can change, even to a one that is non-Hosian, and they could just destroy it then. Why would the government even want to own a monastery, it would make much more sense for the churches themselves to own them. |
| Date | 01:14:52, July 30, 2021 CET | From | Union of Luthorian Hosian Churches | To | Debating the [OOC: RP DISCUSSION]The Union of Luthorian Hosian Churches purchases a medieval monastery in the outskirts of Fort William, plans to restore it to a functioning monastery for use for Churches and ULHC |
| Message | That doesn't really make sense to me. What difference does it make that who owns it? Besides, government's can change, even to a one that is non-Hosian, and they could just destroy it then. Why would the government even want to own a monastery, it would make much more sense for the churches themselves to own them. |
| Date | 12:22:58, July 30, 2021 CET | From | Union of Luthorian Hosian Churches | To | Debating the [OOC: RP DISCUSSION]The Union of Luthorian Hosian Churches purchases a medieval monastery in the outskirts of Fort William, plans to restore it to a functioning monastery for use for Churches and ULHC |
| Message | seeing no major opposition, I'll move this to vote and depending on that, I'll either continue with this or not. |
| Date | 15:45:40, July 30, 2021 CET | From | Monarchist Tory Party | To | Debating the [OOC: RP DISCUSSION]The Union of Luthorian Hosian Churches purchases a medieval monastery in the outskirts of Fort William, plans to restore it to a functioning monastery for use for Churches and ULHC |
| Message | I don’t see why anyone would have any major ooc problem with this, and I personally don’t really have an IC problem with it either. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 150 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
| Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw |