Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:27:14
Server time: 19:32:45, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AR Drax | itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Catholic-Limitation act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Stalemate Equality Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2225

Description[?]:

SEP will go against its roots to protect this nation from influx of Catholic Influence

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:09:55, May 08, 2006 CET
FromKolonial Partei
ToDebating the Catholic-Limitation act
MessageAs much as we dislike Catholicism, this has implications of limiting free speech. We must strive to purge Catholicism from influencing our domestic and foreign policies completely and promote Lutheranism instead. If we can get out of league with Deltaria, then I think we'd be on a good start. Then we'd have to concentrate on Shintoism on the home front.

Date00:07:06, May 09, 2006 CET
FromCommunist Party of Gishoto
ToDebating the Catholic-Limitation act
MessageWe think purging reactionaries like the GNP would be a much better place to start.

Date03:52:43, May 09, 2006 CET
FromKolonial Partei
ToDebating the Catholic-Limitation act
MessagePot calling the kettle black. Communism is the most reactionary ideology out there, right next to fascism.

Date09:19:56, May 09, 2006 CET
FromStalemate Equality Party
ToDebating the Catholic-Limitation act
MessageCPG are you with me? Are there any aspect you wish to change my friend?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 91

no
  

Total Seats: 9

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "I think one should not go fast, because if you make mistakes you don't realize what you've done." - Manuela Carmena

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65