We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Catholic-Limitation act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Stalemate Equality Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2225
Description[?]:
SEP will go against its roots to protect this nation from influx of Catholic Influence |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning the visitation of foreign missionaries.
Old value:: Foreign missionaries are welcomed and encouraged by the government.
Current: The government requires foreign missionaries to register with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Proposed: The government determines which missionaries are permitted to visit on a person by person basis.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards evangelism and religious advertising.
Old value:: Religions are permitted to freely promote and advertise themselves.
Current: Religions are required to obtain government approval before promoting themselves or advertising in any manner.
Proposed: Religions are required to obtain government approval before promoting themselves or advertising in any manner.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Any religion may set up a school, with no regulations.
Current: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Proposed: Only recognised religions may set up religious schools, with no regulations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:09:55, May 08, 2006 CET | From | Kolonial Partei | To | Debating the Catholic-Limitation act |
Message | As much as we dislike Catholicism, this has implications of limiting free speech. We must strive to purge Catholicism from influencing our domestic and foreign policies completely and promote Lutheranism instead. If we can get out of league with Deltaria, then I think we'd be on a good start. Then we'd have to concentrate on Shintoism on the home front. |
Date | 00:07:06, May 09, 2006 CET | From | Communist Party of Gishoto | To | Debating the Catholic-Limitation act |
Message | We think purging reactionaries like the GNP would be a much better place to start. |
Date | 03:52:43, May 09, 2006 CET | From | Kolonial Partei | To | Debating the Catholic-Limitation act |
Message | Pot calling the kettle black. Communism is the most reactionary ideology out there, right next to fascism. |
Date | 09:19:56, May 09, 2006 CET | From | Stalemate Equality Party | To | Debating the Catholic-Limitation act |
Message | CPG are you with me? Are there any aspect you wish to change my friend? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 91 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 9 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "I think one should not go fast, because if you make mistakes you don't realize what you've done." - Manuela Carmena |