We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Judicial Appointments Act 4977
Details
Submitted by[?]: All Progressive Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4978
Description[?]:
To provide for official appointment of judicial officials. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:15:57, August 04, 2021 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Judicial Appointments Act 4977 |
Message | Similar to the military appointments act of 4977, government is seeking to amend the way in which judicial appointments are made. To foster effective delivery of justice and for better administration of the judicial service. Signed Justice Dr. Mateo RodrÃguez Minister of Justice |
Date | 13:27:19, August 04, 2021 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Judicial Appointments Act 4977 |
Message | Similar to the military appointments act of 4977, government is seeking to amend the way in which judicial appointments are made. To foster effective delivery of justice and for better administration of the judicial service. Signed Justice Dr. Mateo RodrÃguez Minister of Justice |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes |
Total Seats: 175 | |
no | Total Seats: 0 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
Random quote: "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber." - Plato |