We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: De-Segregation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Agrarian Populist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4980
Description[?]:
It is time to end this regime of segregation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Racial segregation of public amenities (eg. drinking fountains, public toilets)
Old value:: All public amenities are segregated.
Current: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Proposed: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government recognition of interracial marriages (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Interracial marriages are not recognised by the government.
Current: Mixed race marriages follow the same regulation as other marriages.
Proposed: Mixed race marriages follow the same regulation as other marriages.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The legality of interracial sex.
Old value:: Interracial sex is completely illegal.
Current: Interracial sex is legal.
Proposed: The government has no policy concerning interracial sex.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:08:34, August 09, 2021 CET | From | Liberal Party | To | Debating the De-Segregation Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We believe de-segregation should be an incremental process. It takes time to change mentalities and businesses have to adapt. Our parliamentary group will therefore abstain. Simon Sambrook, MP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 176 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 93 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 31 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
Random quote: "Modern technology owes ecology an apology." - Alan M. Eddison |