We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Green Manalishi Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2228
Description[?]:
The new proposal makes sense in circumstances where national defense or internal security is at stake (etc.). We already have neutral bodies set-up to determine compensation, so don't envisage any problems with this amendment. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The policy regarding eminent domain is left to local governments.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works and for corporate use.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:39:11, May 12, 2006 CET | From | Free Conservative Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Act |
Message | nooooooo |
Date | 19:50:21, May 12, 2006 CET | From | Green Manalishi Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Act |
Message | (ooc: yes luke, i am your father) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 507 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 118 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "Racism isn't born, folks; it's taught. I have a two-year-old son. You know what he hates? Naps! End of list." - Dennis Leary |