Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 03:16:24
Server time: 08:43:35, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Pension System Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Green Manalishi Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2228

Description[?]:

Again, we open this up to debate.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:35:45, May 12, 2006 CET
From Growth and Prosperity Party
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageWhy in the world would you want to ban private pensions?

Date17:17:25, May 12, 2006 CET
From Jelbék Zemojad Lofrkad Prta
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageAlthough we prefer public ownership, the GPP is right. This makes no sense.

Date18:56:56, May 12, 2006 CET
From Green Manalishi Party
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageA balancing of the scales.

Date19:36:51, May 12, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageLooking at GMP's new bills, it seems they want to abolish freedom itself.

Date19:49:08, May 12, 2006 CET
From Green Manalishi Party
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageWe believe that FCP's notions on freedom work somewhere along the same lines as "we're all equal, but some are just more equal than others".

Date22:12:20, May 12, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageSo, taking away the right to a pension is more free than not?????

Date22:59:26, May 12, 2006 CET
From Green Manalishi Party
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageFCP: you'll note that everyone in our proposed system has "the right to a pension".

Date02:41:23, May 13, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageAnd the current system gives amount "X." If an employer wants to, they can add "Y." You are taking "Y" out and only giving "X."

All this does is lower pensions.

Date03:03:08, May 13, 2006 CET
From Green Manalishi Party
ToDebating the Pension System Act
Messageall this does is lower pensions? where did the FCP jump to that conclusion from? As for the "Y" factor, it has already been added through numerous inherent flaws in our social equilibrium.

Date15:44:27, May 13, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageOK, so you wish to increase public pensions. Your going to get the money by taxing business, aren't you?

Date20:42:08, May 13, 2006 CET
From Green Manalishi Party
ToDebating the Pension System Act
Messagethanks for the suggestion!

Date15:52:11, May 15, 2006 CET
From Jelbék Zemojad Lofrkad Prta
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageThe DLP has never before said this, but we agree with the Conservatives! People should be allowed to take out their own pension as well as public pensions, it is just like a savings account, a personal matter.

Date19:26:53, May 16, 2006 CET
From Jelbék Zemojad Lofrkad Prta
ToDebating the Pension System Act
MessageErr, after a great deal of research, we've changed our minds. So long as the public pensions are big enough.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 121

no
   

Total Seats: 386

abstain
   

Total Seats: 118


Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information.

Random quote: "Power always has to be kept in check; power exercised in secret, especially under the cloak of national security, is doubly dangerous." - William Proxmire

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69