Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5483
Next month in: 02:58:14
Server time: 09:01:45, May 15, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanKal | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of June 5018

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rutanian Centre Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 5019

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:56:54, October 25, 2021 CET
FromThe Federalists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
MessageI commend the RCP's willingness to include as many parties as possible to create a big-tent coalition. We think this is a great way to ensure cooperation in the government. The NCC will support this cabinet.

Date14:16:43, October 25, 2021 CET
FromLiberal Party of Rutania
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
MessageThe Liberal party will support this cabinet.

Date16:17:28, October 25, 2021 CET
FromRutanian Centre Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
MessageI would like to know whether the UPP would like to be part of this cabinet or whether their positions can be allocated to ourselves.

President Cameron

Date16:25:05, October 25, 2021 CET
FromThe Federalists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
MessageI believe the UPP should be in the cabinet. Exclusion of the UPP or the Liberals will result in a 'no' vote from the NCC.

Date17:19:02, October 25, 2021 CET
FromRutanian Centre Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
MessageWe are not suggesting that we would exclude anyone. You need to be mindful of how you communicate, your use of language is divisive. We have worked with the Liberals for too long to ever consider excluding them, we need to ensure the UPA want to be part of the coalition because it is their choice. I would remind you that the NCC is the smallest party and we are including you because we like some of your policies, and wish to work with you.

President Cameron

Date18:54:47, October 25, 2021 CET
FromThe Socials
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
MessageExcluding the major party isnt very democratic. We have won the most of the populations support and have the right to also be in a cabinet.

Date20:28:10, October 25, 2021 CET
FromRutanian Centre Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
MessageYou won the most seats, you did not win most of the populations support. If you had won most of the populations support, you could govern alone. You can’t, so we will.

President Cameron

Date22:49:17, October 25, 2021 CET
FromThe Socials
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
MessageTats...Not true. I just checked and 2 million more people voted for me. Tats definetly more support.

Date02:22:44, October 26, 2021 CET
FromSocialist Party of Rutania
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
MessageThe UPA sees this as a solid comprimise and som recieves the support of the UPA

Date02:33:26, October 26, 2021 CET
FromSocialist Party of Rutania
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
Message(OOC; Aplogies for my spelling! Keyboard typing isn't my strongsuit, meant "so" not "som"

Date21:28:21, October 26, 2021 CET
FromThe Socials
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 5018
MessageEveryone is against me as it seems. The populace wont be happy. It looks like everyone is excluding us the socialists. Tats not very nice.
"A coalition is like a dictatorship. When you do it you get it."

- Eliot Sparkler

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 369

no
 

Total Seats: 131

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

    Random quote: "If the Third World War is fought with nuclear weapons, the fourth will be fought with bows and arrows." - Louis Mountbatten

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 67