Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5575
Next month in: 01:22:42
Server time: 18:37:17, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: LDP Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Democrat Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2228

Description[?]:

The LDP has some issues with some of our current laws and this is our chance to correct them. There is a reason for each so if you disagree with one write to us and we shall endevour to help you understand our point of view

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:21:33, May 12, 2006 CET
FromSocial Devolutionist
ToDebating the LDP Bill
MessageAn eclectic mix, and as such a mix that the SD will be unable to vote for. That of course will be ahuge dissapointment to you given we have no votes anyway. For what it's worht We would vote yes to 4, possible yes to 3 and 5 and no to 1 and 2.

Date18:55:59, May 12, 2006 CET
FromSegue Democratic Alliance
ToDebating the LDP Bill
MessageThe SDA has a worryingly identical position to the SD, we half-support this bill. We have yet to decide our vote. A Bill containing only Articles 3, 4 and 5 would be assured of our support.

Date03:30:04, May 13, 2006 CET
FromVanuku Nationalists Party
ToDebating the LDP Bill
MessageTo Mixed LDP. break it up.

Date04:19:14, May 13, 2006 CET
FromLiberal Democrat Party
ToDebating the LDP Bill
MessageThe LDP asks that if u support half the bill or 3 admendments than vote yes.. u can change the others if desired.

In relation to article I, the LDP leader had the following to say:
"We feel that as a nation we do indeed have the right to ban the death penalty from being used within our borders, however we also feel that we cannot command the actions or inactions of another nation. We live in a global community where all nations must be treated equally. We must accept there laws just as they accept ours. Any citizen of Vanuku knows the consequences of there actions in a foreign land, and they as well as the rest of the Vanuku citizens, must accept the consequences of this. This change is about co-exisiting in a global community. Whether we agree or disagree with the death penalty we must accpet it, in just the same fashion that other countires must accept and abide by the laws of our land."

Date00:17:56, May 15, 2006 CET
FromConservative Republican Federalists
ToDebating the LDP Bill
MessageI would "no" to #4. But I would tend to agree with the rest. Thus, I will support this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 455

no
  

Total Seats: 105

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364

    Random quote: "The United States is in no sense founded upon the Christian doctrine." - George Washington

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 86