We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Non-Combat Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2227
Description[?]:
| This act will put women back into non-combat roles. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve alongside men.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:17:11, May 14, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Non-Combat Act |
| Message | Against. We have fought to achieve equal rights for men and women. What's wrong with the current bill? Someone's afraid of having a higher ranking female? Or maybe the enemy won't want to surrender to a female? :P |
| Date | 01:20:55, May 14, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Non-Combat Act |
| Message | We also regret there was no debating time. I know I like bills being moved to a vote quicker, but then I'm talking about bills of like 10 years old who're clogging up the debate area... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 215 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 117 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 55 |
| Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
| Random quote: "You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money." - P. J. O'Rourke |