We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RP: The Dissolution of the Taeyang Agreements
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 5053
Description[?]:
| The Taeyang Agreements, aptly named as they were decided and agreed upon by the CSL and CPRU in the northeastern city of Taeyang, were a series of political rules in which the two parties ruled together and shared collective power. The head of government and cabinet were reshuffled every election, and the CPRU agreed to recognize the Daejungguk as a theocratic state in return for the CSL agreeing to respect some ethnic, gender, and sexual minority rights. The agreement was shaky and often led to mass discontent, but ultimately saved Dankuk from the perceived brink of civil war. On August 3 5052, General Secretary of the Communist Party Noh Dae-Wu formally announced the CPRU's rejection to and withdrawal from the Agreements, after years of increased political tensions in Dankuk. This was shortly followed by confirmation from the CSL that the two parties had agreed to legally pull out of the agreed framework; which had shaped the Dranian political status quo for decades. The exact ramifications of the end of the Taeyang Agreements are unknown, but polarization is expected to increase in the coming months. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:04:56, January 01, 2022 CET | From | ☯ DPDP ☯ | To | Debating the RP: The Dissolution of the Taeyang Agreements |
| Message | The stated reasons given for the controversial decision was the CSL's increase in Kyo supremacist sentiments and "complete and total disregard for ethnic minority rights", as the strongly-worded announcement Mr. Noh gave put it. Tensions had already been building over regards to cultural issues, the state of the socialist economy, and xenohpobia vs internationalism; but it appears as if the CSL's decision to revise Amendment I of the Constitution was the final straw for the Communist Party. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 95 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 5 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon so long as there is no answer to it gives claws to the weak." - George Orwell |