Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5477
Next month in: 03:30:24
Server time: 20:29:35, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): henryT | Infinite | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Strong Military Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Republican Party (RP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 5055

Description[?]:

We propose the following to strengthen the military.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:34:53, January 06, 2022 CET
FromFORWARD!
ToDebating the Strong Military Bill
MessageFORWARD! supports Articles 1-4, but does not support Articles 5 and 6 and can not support this bill in its current form. We welcome a follow up bill only including Articles 1-4.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 220

no
     

Total Seats: 289

abstain
 

Total Seats: 91


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "All this concern with the effects of global warming is another manifestation of being politically correct." - David Young

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67