Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:39:28
Server time: 20:20:31, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AR Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Media Privatisation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of Protection and Independence

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 5082

Description[?]:

In seeking to minimize the states role in mass media, the government wishes to privatize all radio and television stations.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:21:41, March 01, 2022 CET
FromThe Labour Party of Likatonia
ToDebating the Media Privatisation Act
Message
The privatisation of the independent media means that independent public service media, that serves the people and that is and independent examiner of the government, cooperations and companies, is now longer there.
All private television stations is, no matter if they claim to be independent, are funded by people or by cooperations that have a certain angle and that is not matter what, dependent on that money being delivered, which means they are not in fact independent and objective. Only an independent public service organisation, funded by the government, and ruled by independent and neutral people with no political bias. We therefore vote against the bill.
We would however by open to allowing a public service organisation beside private organisations that exist and serve different purposes.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 195

no
 

Total Seats: 155

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "There is a mandate to impose a voluntary return to traditional values." - Ronald Reagan

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 47