We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Woman's Choice Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Feminist Federalist Front (FFF) 🎀
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 5104
Description[?]:
We believe that Baltusian women should have autonomy over their bodies, and this bill would expand such autonomy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Proposed: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Policy of the government concerning the funding of abortions
Old value:: The government provides abortion funding only for low-income earners.
Current: The government only funds abortions for medical emergencies.
Proposed: The government provides funding for abortions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:00:38, April 12, 2022 CET | From | Baltusian Libertarian Party (BLP) | To | Debating the Woman's Choice Act |
Message | Opposed. |
Date | 21:02:09, April 12, 2022 CET | From | Baltusian Free Democrats (BFD) | To | Debating the Woman's Choice Act |
Message | We do not support this. If you do not want a child you should protect yourself during sex. If you dont protect yourself its your own fault. Also abortion in the 3rd trimester is just murder. |
Date | 21:13:08, April 12, 2022 CET | From | New Green Party (NGP) | To | Debating the Woman's Choice Act |
Message | We fully support this. |
Date | 21:16:37, April 12, 2022 CET | From | Baltusian Free Democrats (BFD) | To | Debating the Woman's Choice Act |
Message | May I ask why exactly? |
Date | 21:19:16, April 12, 2022 CET | From | Baltusian Libertarian Party (BLP) | To | Debating the Woman's Choice Act |
Message | As the BLP we'd like to know why the NGP supports an abortion in the 3rd trimester. In this stage of pregnancy, it is just murder anymore. Also the mother could've just abort the baby in the first/second trimester. |
Date | 23:28:09, April 12, 2022 CET | From | Technocratic Party of Baltusia (TPB) | To | Debating the Woman's Choice Act |
Message | We disagree, the entire pregnancy is a step too far for us |
Date | 05:55:12, April 13, 2022 CET | From | Feminist Federalist Front (FFF) 🎀 | To | Debating the Woman's Choice Act |
Message | The BPD needs to retract their first statement. Many women are forced to have children and some of them have the child get into the third trimester against their will. This bill is for them. |
Date | 20:30:39, April 13, 2022 CET | From | New Green Party (NGP) | To | Debating the Woman's Choice Act |
Message | We agree with the statement from the Feminist Party on this. While some people may consider abortion in the third trimester murder, there could be several reasons that they may cause someone to make this choice. The child may reach the third semester against their will, as brought up by the Feminist Party. Additionally, life situations may change and the mother may not be able to support the child, although adoption could be another option for this situation, however the option of adoption may not always be available to everybody. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 146 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 434 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 20 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "The belief in the possibility of a short decisive war appears to be one of the most ancient and dangerous of human illusions." - Robert Lynd |