We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Redefining our curfewlaws.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2235
Description[?]:
We should establish a curfew time. This should be done to prevent crime and other unloyal situations. The curfew time should mean that only people with granted permission may be outside between 2 a.m. and 5. a.m.! The permission will be incorporated in the I.D. card and will be given to those working inside the curfew time or those with special reasons for being out inside the curfew time. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: No-one may use streets or public property beyond the curfew time.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:27:42, May 28, 2006 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Redefining our curfewlaws. |
Message | "other unloyal situations. " - Excuse me? Whilst we are not against strong, perhaps even authoritarian, leadership this seems to slide further into the abiss of Totalitarian dictatorship. What's wrong, concerned that your little "communist" paradise might be forced to come to an end by the people? N.B. Communist is in "..." because we do not believe for a second that this Country is following a true communist philosophy, rather we are moving toward State dictatorship. |
Date | 13:28:49, May 30, 2006 CET | From | Deltarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Redefining our curfewlaws. |
Message | I would also like to voice a note of caution of how these bills are heading. We are now heading towards the thin line between a communist proletarian dictatorship and an outright dictatorship. The people have to have some freedoms and while I do think that we need a strong rule we should not confuse strong rule with oppression. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 116 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 284 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell) |