We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Enviornment
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2239
Description[?]:
| I may have went overboard... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Current: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Proposed: The government promotes forest clearance.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments.
Current: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Proposed: Hunting and fishing is not regulated.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: Industrial pollution is not regulated by the government.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government requires tree plantation at replacement level for all logging or clearance operations.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government discourages tree plantation.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: It is the responsibility of local governments to decide on waste disposal regulation.
Current: It is the responsibility of local governments to decide on waste disposal regulation.
Proposed: Waste disposal is left entirely to the private sector and is unregulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:20:57, June 06, 2006 CET | From |  New Daio Party | To | Debating the Enviornment |
| Message | Some of it I have no problem with, but other parts I think are a bit overboard. 1) In combination with 4, would eliminate our supply of wood in not too long a time. Any policy that would force us to import items is unacceptable. 2) Would prefer that Prefectures handle this, as they are better able to handle things as opposed to any blanket policy from the federal government, even lack of a policy. 3) I would reccomend at the least that guidelines be set up. 5) No problem. Either present option or that option are acceptable to me. |
| Date | 04:01:30, June 07, 2006 CET | From | H.C.P.Z | To | Debating the Enviornment |
| Message | Good point with 1 and i agree with you on this issue! but im still going to put it to vote cause i want to be a skeptic! |
| Date | 03:55:50, June 08, 2006 CET | From | Party for the Promotion of Pandas | To | Debating the Enviornment |
| Message | a resounding no |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 59 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 215 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 59 |
| Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy". |
| Random quote: "The opportunity to serve our country, that is all we ask." - John Smith |