We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Gesetz zum Schutz des Glaubens
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nationale Dundorfische Partei 🏴
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 5234
Description[?]:
| NDP believes that institutional ban on endorsement of parties and candidates by religions and religious figures, and ban on wearing of religious symbols by public officials is in direct opposition to Dundorfian heritage and culture. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the endorsement of candidates and parties by religions and religious figures
Old value:: Religious figures and religions are allowed to publicly endorse policies, but not political parties and individual candidates.
Current: Religious figures and religions are allowed to publicly endorse candidates, political parties and policies.
Proposed: Religious figures and religions are allowed to publicly endorse candidates, political parties and policies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:57:24, December 30, 2022 CET | From | Dundorfs Sozialdemokratische Partei 🌹 | To | Debating the Gesetz zum Schutz des Glaubens |
| Message | The DSDP will continue to support a secular Dundorf by voting against this bill. |
| Date | 19:00:32, December 30, 2022 CET | From | Staatspartei Dundorf 🔥 | To | Debating the Gesetz zum Schutz des Glaubens |
| Message | Like our social democratic peers, we too are incline to support a secular line on ecclesiastical matters of importance as this is the best way of preserving civil and religious liberty for all citizens whether they subscribe to a particular belief or none at all. |
| Date | 23:29:24, December 30, 2022 CET | From | Bewegung D46 🎈 | To | Debating the Gesetz zum Schutz des Glaubens |
| Message | We are disappointed that the Staatspartei voted against this. Nothing in this bill fights against secularism but rather for it. It isn't preferring any religion other another and finally ends some of the strict (and non-secular) regulations the government has put on religious people |
| Date | 06:13:24, December 31, 2022 CET | From | Dundorf Soziale Volkspartei ⚖️ | To | Debating the Gesetz zum Schutz des Glaubens |
| Message | Why wouldn't we allow religous figures the right to freedom of speech? Why wouldn't we allow people the freedom to dress according to their religious beliefs? This bill defends religious freedom, something that is vital for a secular state. It seems like some parties confuses the term "secular state" with "atheist state". |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 206 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 329 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 60 |
| Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum! |
| Random quote: "The state is nothing but an instrument of oppression of one class by another, no less so in a democratic republic than in a monarchy." - John Smith |