We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Libertarian Coalition Cabinet
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alliance for Natural Law
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2070
Description[?]:
| A libertarian coalition cabinet of four parties, as shown above. |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the Szef Walruziańskiej Ligi Socjalistycznej i Republiki Walruzyjskiej chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the 
Liberal Democrats
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Alliance for Natural Law
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal Democrats
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Libertarian Party of Valruzia
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Liberal Democrats
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Social-Liberty Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Social-Liberty Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Libertarian Party of Valruzia
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Alliance for Natural Law
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:39:47, June 22, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | OOC: Gonna try seeing what happens if two cabinets pass at once, if possible. If not possible, we table this one and just vote for the LD one. |
| Date | 03:40:03, June 22, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | Old, deleted messages: From Liberal Democrats Message Hmm also 3 ministries for me in this one. But, not the 3 I'd like to have. Although Internal Affairs is nice :). But I'd rather like to have Education and Science than Health and Defense. I dunno what we'll vote :) Date 20:58:23, June 21, 2005 CET From Head of StateLargest Party Anarchist Party Message OOC: A Libertarian Coalition as President Odanaroh wants. Let us assume for the sake of argument that she proposed it. Note: I may table this bill, I haven't decided who wins my party's internal fights yet. If neCebant wins then we vote for the LDP's bill. If any of the above parties says no, then I'd have to table it anyways. Otherwise, I'll RP it and see how my storyline unfolds. Date 21:00:02, June 21, 2005 CET From Head of StateLargest Party Anarchist Party Message Education I want anyways. If the President wins, she may concede to get it passed though. How do I change proposed positions? Date 21:01:44, June 21, 2005 CET From Liberal Democrats Message Well, if I can't get Education than please trade Health for Science. In that case we might vote for, at this moment it's a no :) Date 21:05:48, June 21, 2005 CET From Head of StateLargest Party Anarchist Party Message OOC: How do I change cabinet positions around? Date 21:06:59, June 21, 2005 CET From Liberal Democrats Message OOC: If I knew I would tell you, but alas I don't know :( Date 21:11:55, June 21, 2005 CET From Head of StateLargest Party Anarchist Party Message Do I just have to table and produce a new one? Kinda looks that way. If that's the case, I'll wait to hear what the other two have to say before doing anything. Date 21:14:01, June 21, 2005 CET From Social-Liberty Party Message We would vote for it, and support the idea of a coalition cabinet. OOC: If you can't find a way to change it, remove this one and propose the updated one maybe Date 21:23:24, June 21, 2005 CET From Radical Socialists Message It looks bad for the people of Valruzia. Date 22:20:12, June 21, 2005 CET From Restoration Party Message anything is better than you lot in charge!! Date 02:11:06, June 22, 2005 CET From Red and Green Bloc Message You are triumphnant now capitalists but it will not last. (i'd vote no by the way) Date 02:27:58, June 22, 2005 CET From Libertarian Party Message We support this. |
| Date | 03:44:05, June 22, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | Hmm, education or defense. Tough choice. And internal affairs vs economic affairs. Both are good :) |
| Date | 03:44:23, June 22, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | Let me think about this for a while. |
| Date | 03:55:48, June 22, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberty Party | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | I think whichever gets more than 50% first wins |
| Date | 14:25:54, June 22, 2005 CET | From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | Such a cabinet means disaster. |
| Date | 18:20:55, June 22, 2005 CET | From | Restoration Party | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | Incidentally, we feel that we have as many liberatrian credentials as the LD. We have generoslu included, UNNECESSARIL,Y all of our libertarian allies in every cabient we proposed and supported. We view this exclusion with an extreme lot of displeasure but are glad that we now know that we cannot rely on this coalition for anything. Regards, DS |
| Date | 01:03:55, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | OOC: RP, I think that I explained already, this is an IC thing. This is the Odanaroh cabinet, LDP's is the neCebant cabinet. The exclusion of you and the DBP is nothing personal, or well it is, but on the part of my character not on the part of myself. Fear not on either pasing, as Luke Avaen z'Dragchon should be back in power by next election (of course then, somebody else will be the majority party and have the presidency, but meh). |
| Date | 01:05:41, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | OOC: PS, and yes, as Odanaroh mentioned on the news network you do have the libertarian credentials of the LD. Which in here opinion is not enough. She wanted to exclude both you and the LD, i her proposal, but could see no way of doing so. |
| Date | 02:27:04, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | OOC: This is the Odanaroh cabinet, LDP's is the neCebant cabinet. --- No, I proposed it, it's not his cabinet, he just agrees with it. |
| Date | 02:27:43, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | By the way, with the passing of the cabinet I proposed I think it's quite useless for me now to vote for this one. |
| Date | 02:28:01, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | Sorry SLP and LP, maybe another time :) |
| Date | 02:32:23, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Libertarian Coalition Cabinet |
| Message | OOC: LD, that's what I was saying. The tact and simple political calculation that neCebant likes. Odanaroh is strictly an idealist, and LAzD, who I've resurrected now is a bit of both. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 67 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 107 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 1 |
| Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum. |
| Random quote: "The right to suffer is one of the joys of a free economy." - Howard Pyle (commenting on unemployment in Detroit) |