We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: post office bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: fiodor Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2246
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office agency in the nation. Private ones are banned.
Current: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:44:27, June 20, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the post office bill |
| Message | We'll support. |
| Date | 17:40:10, June 25, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the post office bill |
| Message | Opposed |
| Date | 06:35:28, June 27, 2006 CET | From | Federal Conservatives | To | Debating the post office bill |
| Message | I would support this but would prefer to drop the "regulation" of these private post offices. Let them exist and let the people decide without the government sticking it's nose into things more than required. As this stands, it just adds yet another government beuracracy. |
| Date | 12:44:30, June 27, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the post office bill |
| Message | On a side-note: We'ld still support if the regulation would be dropped |
| Date | 14:12:10, June 27, 2006 CET | From | fiodor Party | To | Debating the post office bill |
| Message | the regulations was dropped... |
| Date | 19:16:06, June 27, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the post office bill |
| Message | This bill is just stupid. We were leaning towards supporting it but then you dropped the regulations. Because of that, we oppose as an unregulated private companies will open the door to abuse. We will not support such a thing. Opposed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 258 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 241 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Treaties will be eligible for deletion if they are more than 50 in-game years old and have no currently ratified members. |
| Random quote: "I don’t have facts to back this up." - Herman Cain |