We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Increased Secularism Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Workers Union ☭
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 5371
Description[?]:
| This goal of this bill is to make a clear line between church and state. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the endorsement of candidates and parties by religions and religious figures
Old value:: Religious figures and religions are allowed to publicly endorse candidates, political parties and policies.
Current: Religious figures and religions are allowed to publicly endorse candidates, political parties and policies.
Proposed: Religious figures and religions are not allowed to publicly endorse candidates, political parties and policies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
Taxation of religious institutions.
Old value:: Recognized religions are not taxed.
Current: Recognized religions are not taxed.
Proposed: Religions are treated as companies, and all profit is taxed, however, charitable donations are not taxed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Current: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Proposed: There is no official state religion, but the government only allows recognized religions. 'Cults' are persecuted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:59:33, October 01, 2023 CET | From | Movement of Freedom (ΜF) | To | Debating the Increased Secularism Bill |
| Message | it's a little bit ironic that the so-called progressive party proposes bills that want to deprive the right of religious people. We urge the other parties to vote no. Zoe Olsen, Leader of the Movement Of Freedom. |
| Date | 11:56:04, October 01, 2023 CET | From |  United Workers Union ☭ | To | Debating the Increased Secularism Bill |
| Message | Religion has stood in the way of progress for centuries and should thus not be interfering with our state. We are not against religion, but we would like to keep church and state completely separated. There is no article in this bill that deprives religious people of their rights. Rex Mudro, Founder of the Progressive Workers Party. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 404 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 46 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." - Barry Goldwater |