We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Retirement Age Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2072
Description[?]:
| A law to establish the retirement age of the population. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 62
Current: 62
Proposed: 65
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:17:28, June 22, 2005 CET | From | League of Social Reformation | To | Debating the Retirement Age Act |
| Message | We are in favour of 65, but no higher. |
| Date | 19:49:09, June 22, 2005 CET | From | Party of Kanjor | To | Debating the Retirement Age Act |
| Message | We are also in favour of 65 currently, and may support a higher retirement age in the future. |
| Date | 20:00:27, June 22, 2005 CET | From | Groep Hooyer, Socialist Party of Kanjor | To | Debating the Retirement Age Act |
| Message | 65 is high enough, people have to enjoy their old days, dont need to work their whole lives |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 55 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 12 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 33 |
| Random fact: When your party holds the foreign affairs department, you can create new treaties. However, before writing anything new, it is a good idea to search for existing treaties which already accomplish what you desire. |
| Random quote: "Unlike the world of free-markets, in political government when some individuals win, other individuals lose." - Robert Klassen |