We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reciprocal Trade Act of 2247
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Freedom Party of Jakania
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2247
Description[?]:
A BILL to ensure equal treatment in international trade. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change International trade (this is a default in the absense of a specific free trade agreement or specific trade embargo)
Old value:: The nation does not impose any tariffs or quotas on imports.
Current: The nation allows for imports, but imposes tariffs and quotas in certain areas.
Proposed: The nation imposes reciprocal tariffs on imports, with no tariffs imposed on states which impose no tariffs on our exports.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:35:30, June 30, 2006 CET | From | Jakania Union Party | To | Debating the Reciprocal Trade Act of 2247 |
Message | We support this proposal. |
Date | 20:33:41, July 01, 2006 CET | From | FDR23 Party | To | Debating the Reciprocal Trade Act of 2247 |
Message | We support this proposal |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 196 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 54 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |