Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 02:35:05
Server time: 09:24:54, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Dx6743 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali

Details

Submitted by[?]: One Nation Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2250

Description[?]:

A continuation of bill no 1

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:24:49, June 30, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
MessageArticle 1we must erxert some control over these companies. they are dealing in lethal weapons that end lives after all.

Date23:29:34, June 30, 2006 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
Messageopposed to both articles.

Date23:39:18, June 30, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
MessageWe support the first. And although we understand the good intentions behind it, we're gonna oppose the second.

Date02:13:45, July 01, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
Messageundecided about 1 and a definite no on the 2nd.

Date11:00:21, July 01, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
Messagewould parties support if the bill was split up and article 2 was removed?

Date11:17:40, July 01, 2006 CET
Fromfiodor Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
Messagewe oppose to the first and support the second.

Date15:50:18, July 01, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
MessageYou support a bill that will harvest organs without the person's consent? Yuck.

Date23:53:27, July 01, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
MessageIt's just the difference between an opt-in and an opt-out system.. Actually, in most countries where the so-called opt-out system (consent is assumed, unless they've made it clear before they don't want to donate their organs), the views of the relatives are asked, and they can refuse.

Date12:20:10, July 02, 2006 CET
Fromfiodor Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
Message"You support a bill that will harvest organs without the person's consent? Yuck"

if the person is dead wath is the problem?
he will no need them anymore...

Date18:15:33, July 02, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
MessageAnd what if it goes against his wishes to do so?

Date09:56:42, July 03, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
Messagethen he can state so can't he

" Unless stated" DUH

Date15:45:43, July 03, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
MessageAnd what if he doesn't do that and he still doesn't want his organs donated? This is ripe for abuse and this should be voted down.

Date15:43:21, July 06, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the A bigger government for a bigger and better tukarali
Messagewell if he doesn't want his organs to be donated he just has to legally state so as would be his legal right. How will that be abused. It is very simple and effective which is why it shouldn't be voted down.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 126

no
   

Total Seats: 267

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset.

Random quote: "Conservatives define themselves in terms of what they oppose." - George Will

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 79