Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:52:47
Server time: 20:07:12, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Aldegar's retraction from the Bannderspakt

Details

Submitted by[?]: URAD🦚🪷🕊🦁

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 5473

Description[?]:

Sneaky bitches all of them

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:18:27, April 21, 2024 CET
From URAD🦚🪷🕊🦁
ToDebating the Aldegar's retraction from the Bannderspakt
MessageWait a damn minute....

Date15:18:38, April 21, 2024 CET
From URAD🦚🪷🕊🦁
ToDebating the Aldegar's retraction from the Bannderspakt
MessageWHERE DIS THE AMADMENT GO

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 700

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "It is the hallmark of great society to debate and disagree without resorting to violence." - Mathew Jameson, former Hutorian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 38