We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Federal Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Malivian Freedom Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2251
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: Dauphin
Current: सङ्घस्य राष्ट्रपति (Saṅghasya Rāṣṭrápati - President of the Union) / Adhinayak Sanghasya
Proposed: President
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The official title of the legislative assembly.
Old value:: Assembly
Current: प्रतिनिधि सभा (Pratinidhi Sabhā - House of Representatives)
Proposed: Senate
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The official title of subnational entities, also known as regions.
Old value:: Province
Current: राज्यम् (Rājyam - State)
Proposed: State
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The length of a legislative and executive term, in months. Should be between 24 and 72.
Old value:: 36
Current: 60
Proposed: 24
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 301
Current: 543
Proposed: 500
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:02:59, July 07, 2006 CET | From |  Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Federal Act |
| Message | No to the first three, though we will support a change to different titles. We will suggest some at a later date. ok on #4. As to number of seats we prefer something to make the math easy for constitutional bills thus 301, or 601 or some such number. |
| Date | 03:11:50, July 07, 2006 CET | From | Malivian Freedom Party | To | Debating the Federal Act |
| Message | Is it just that they aren't YOUR names that YOU chose that you oppose. The real reason I introduced the change was because plainly, we think the term "Dauphin" is retarded! |
| Date | 03:39:35, July 07, 2006 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Federal Act |
| Message | Lets give you a quick hint. This bill needs two thirds to pass you have 0/3. For it to pass you would need the support of both us and the People's party, since either one of us have enough seats to block it. So it does not help to get the bill passed by attacking us and pushing this to a vote before half the parties even see it. We stated that we would not support president, state, senate not because they weren't our suggestions, rather they are lame and completely unoriginal. To further fill you in we dislike Dauphin as well, thus we where hoping to work with you on something we all could agree on. |
| Date | 08:33:12, July 07, 2006 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the Federal Act |
| Message | To put it simply, no on this Bill. I do not believe that a new party here, like ourselves, has the right to change this nation into the mini-United States of America. |
| Date | 07:45:12, July 08, 2006 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Federal Act |
| Message | I support 4 and 5, the rest are just names so I'll support this anyways |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 145 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 113 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 43 |
| Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
| Random quote: "Presidency, n. The greased pig in the field game of American politics." - Ambrose Bierce |