Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 01:55:03
Server time: 10:04:56, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): itsjustgav | JWDL | RogueGAD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Federal Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Malivian Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2251

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:02:59, July 07, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Federal Act
MessageNo to the first three, though we will support a change to different titles. We will suggest some at a later date.

ok on #4.

As to number of seats we prefer something to make the math easy for constitutional bills thus 301, or 601 or some such number.

Date03:11:50, July 07, 2006 CET
FromMalivian Freedom Party
ToDebating the Federal Act
MessageIs it just that they aren't YOUR names that YOU chose that you oppose. The real reason I introduced the change was because plainly, we think the term "Dauphin" is retarded!

Date03:39:35, July 07, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Federal Act
MessageLets give you a quick hint.
This bill needs two thirds to pass you have 0/3.
For it to pass you would need the support of both us and the People's party, since either one of us have enough seats to block it.
So it does not help to get the bill passed by attacking us and pushing this to a vote before half the parties even see it.

We stated that we would not support president, state, senate not because they weren't our suggestions, rather they are lame and completely unoriginal. To further fill you in we dislike Dauphin as well, thus we where hoping to work with you on something we all could agree on.

Date08:33:12, July 07, 2006 CET
FromUnited Conservative Party
ToDebating the Federal Act
MessageTo put it simply, no on this Bill. I do not believe that a new party here, like ourselves, has the right to change this nation into the mini-United States of America.

Date07:45:12, July 08, 2006 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Federal Act
MessageI support 4 and 5, the rest are just names so I'll support this anyways

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 145

no
  

Total Seats: 113

abstain
 

Total Seats: 43


Random fact: http://www.fantasynamegenerators.com and http://www.behindthename.com/random are great resources for coming up with character names from unfamiliar cultures.

Random quote: "One day our descendants will think it incredible that we paid so much attention to things like the amount of melanin in our skin or the shape of our eyes or our gender instead of the unique identities of each of us as complex human beings." - Franklin Thomas

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66