We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: TOC Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Conservative Party of Beluzia (NCPB)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 5544
Description[?]:
| Train Operating Companies (TOC). |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Train Operating Companies (TOC).
Old value:: There is a single publicly owned TOC.
Current: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Proposed: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:31:48, August 29, 2024 CET | From | Left-Green Alliance | To | Debating the TOC Reform |
| Message | The Government continues to propose legislation with little or no justification; and is incredibly selective in what it actually chooses to answer. |
| Date | 02:36:36, September 12, 2024 CET | From |   New Conservative Party of Beluzia (NCPB) | To | Debating the TOC Reform |
| Message | /\ Hypocrisy at its finest /\ |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes | Total Seats: 426 | |
| no |
Total Seats: 324 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "When strangers start acting like neighbors, communities are reinvigorated." - Ralph Nader |