We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: State Pension
Details
Submitted by[?]: Better Tomorrow Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2252
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state does not operate a pension system. Individuals must save up for retirement on their own.
Current: The state operates a compulsory, public pension system.
Proposed: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:26:29, July 09, 2006 CET | From | Federalists Party | To | Debating the State Pension |
| Message | Why should the government pension system be compulsory? What do you have against letting people decide for themselves? |
| Date | 18:56:10, July 09, 2006 CET | From | Better Tomorrow Party | To | Debating the State Pension |
| Message | We have no minimum wage. How can we expect the lower classes to save for retirement when there is no guarantee that they earn enough to get by as it is? |
| Date | 19:06:24, July 09, 2006 CET | From | Okono Party | To | Debating the State Pension |
| Message | We oppose. I'd rather save up and invest for myself. I'd only support if there was a optional pension system. |
| Date | 14:44:29, July 10, 2006 CET | From | Wantunian Anarcho-Communist Party | To | Debating the State Pension |
| Message | The Wantunian Anarchist Party vote for this resolution. It is a duty for a government to help its citizen. As the capitalist system creates many inequalities,a state using this system must curve any abuse. The state pension could be the first step. We must work during our whole life,now,people will be able to have a peaceful retirement,whatever their job was. This is not a restriction of freedom,as the federalist tries to show it,it is only a step further to a fairer society. |
| Date | 23:20:16, July 10, 2006 CET | From | Federalists Party | To | Debating the State Pension |
| Message | So the ACP believes that having a choice is unfair? Yeah that makes a whole lot of sense. (feel the sarcasm) And to address the BTP, your argument still does not answer the question as to why it must be compulsory. What do you two have against people deciding for themselves? What makes you so much wiser than they? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 500 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/ |
| Random quote: "Whenever a separation is made between liberty and justice, neither, in my opinion, is safe." - Edmund Burke |