We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religous schools
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvik National Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2072
Description[?]:
| We are in favor of liberty and the religous citizens should be allowed to go to a religous school. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Religious schools are not allowed.
Current: Religious schools are allowed, but are strictly regulated. Only recognised religions may set up religious schools.
Proposed: Religious schools are allowed, but are strictly regulated. Only recognised religions may set up religious schools.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:15:17, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Dorvik Conservative Liberals | To | Debating the Religous schools |
| Message | We understand the need to divide spiritual matters from the sphere of politics. But obeying the rules of a strong, democratic state, we underline the personal freedom of belief of every Dorvikian. And although we find the bill's name, as well as description, unsatisfying, we can compromise in the name of freedom and democracy. |
| Date | 16:34:27, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Noordelijk Bevrijding Front | To | Debating the Religous schools |
| Message | No, a complete ban, check previous debates for my argument |
| Date | 21:19:25, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Dorvik National Party | To | Debating the Religous schools |
| Message | DCP i'll change the title and description to what you want if you are so bothered. I'll even say the leader of the GCP has bad B.O. |
| Date | 21:20:03, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Dorvik National Party | To | Debating the Religous schools |
| Message | No affense GCP. |
| Date | 17:23:57, June 25, 2005 CET | From | Noordelijk Bevrijding Front | To | Debating the Religous schools |
| Message | We take offence :-) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 12 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 48 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 40 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "An extremely credible source has called my office and told me that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud." - Donald Trump |