We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reasonable Environmental Standards II
Details
Submitted by[?]: Tuesday Is Coming
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2071
Description[?]:
| As punitive pollution restrictions are known to harm the economy, to the detriment of the nation, we should adopt more reasonable pollution guidelines. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government provides pollution prevention guidelines, but does not enforce them.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:35:21, June 23, 2005 CET | From |  Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Reasonable Environmental Standards II |
| Message | Same bill, but hopefully going a step further into the right direction. Most debate has been touched on...but go ahead... |
| Date | 17:28:37, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Reasonable Environmental Standards II |
| Message | We support this proposal. |
| Date | 19:11:44, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Reasonable Environmental Standards II |
| Message | Obviously we are opposed. We hope the Amystian Council remains of the same opinion it did when it voted for the original tough restrictions on pollution. Environmental law, we have agreed in the past, is one of the areas of national concern. |
| Date | 20:56:50, June 23, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Reasonable Environmental Standards II |
| Message | No way. We all know that corporations do not care about self regulation, especially when there are absolutely no negative ramifications possible. |
| Date | 22:21:14, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Reasonable Environmental Standards II |
| Message | As this bill has already been voted upon, and debate seems to be pretty "stable". I move to vote |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 30 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 160 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 260 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
| Random quote: "If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it." - Ken Livingstone |