We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cherish our Children Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democrats 2251
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2254
Description[?]:
| We should take good care of our children. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding child benefit.
Old value:: The state guarantees child benefit to families classified as low-income or poor.
Current: The state guarantees child benefit to families classified as low-income or poor.
Proposed: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:47:29, July 12, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cherish our Children Act |
| Message | I support this bill. |
| Date | 03:43:11, July 13, 2006 CET | From |  Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Cherish our Children Act |
| Message | Why? So rich families with children can get richer still? So that welfare resources that should be directed to the poor can be re-directed to the rich, stretching them beyond belief? Why is it that socialists seem to always take the most detrimental option when it comes to welfare or economics? |
| Date | 04:26:55, July 13, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cherish our Children Act |
| Message | Hmmm... mabye this was a bit too radical. I think I will either abstain or vote no. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 460 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to err." - Mahatma Gandhi |