Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5484
Next month in: 03:09:45
Server time: 12:50:14, May 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Unemployment Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2256

Description[?]:

A bill to increase employment.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:51:59, July 16, 2006 CET
From Progressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Unemployment Bill
MessageOur economy is in a mess. We have high umemployment across the nation, some regions are worse than others.

Figures from the World Ranking of our regions:

Position(out of 279): Region: Percentage Unemployment:

98 Dilganato 5.55%
193 Tokundi 7.82%
146 Domale 6.89%
212 Egato 8.41%
220 Irkawa 8.58%

These figures prove that our current economic system is not working. We're not attracting sufficient investment, there are not enough jobs available and there is a dangerously large surplus of labour.

Article 1:
Forbids child labour. Children will be at school and will pick up new skills, upskilling the workforce. this also decreases the supply of labour, increaisng employment and prevent the exploitation of young workers.

Article2:
Allows Foreign companies to take over national companies, making Cobura a better place to do business and more attracting to foreign investors who have the capital and expertise to make these companies more efficient and increase employment, helping our enterprise culture develope.

Article 3:
Reduces immigration drammatically. We have a large surplus of labour. Our immigration policy further increases our population, hence our unemployment rate, hence our standard of living declines. The fact that immigrants with the needed skills that we currently lack are wlloed to reside here, means our economy will not be affected. We NEED this article to reduce unemployment and to increase the standard of living of our people.

Article 4:
The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing FAILING industries that provide VITAL goods or services. Business can't function without VITAL goods and services, such as energy, transport, ports, airports etc. If these vital services are not provided we will NOT, we will NOT attract foreign companies to our country. The government will only provide these services if the private sector is unable to. This will decrease unemployment, create a better enterprise culture and attract more foreign investment.

You've see the bill, you've seen the facts, you've heard my proposal. Our country needs this bill, our people need it or their standard of living will continue to decline.

Date13:53:26, July 16, 2006 CET
From Progressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Unemployment Bill
Message(for the figures, 4% is considered aqequate employment in economic terms).

Date20:00:51, July 16, 2006 CET
From United Liberty Party
ToDebating the Unemployment Bill
MessageIf Article 4 is removed, we will support this bill.

Date00:11:35, July 17, 2006 CET
From Progressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Unemployment Bill
Message"by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services"

What is wrong with this? These are VITAL good and services and its a "last resort". If vital goods and services aren't available, companies will be disuaded from setting up shop here.

Date00:45:24, July 18, 2006 CET
From Modern Economic Party of Cobura
ToDebating the Unemployment Bill
Message8%? wow having a freak attack their. look at the numbers of people in the working age compared to those not working and you'll notce how minute the difference is.

btw we do like 2.

Date22:32:44, July 18, 2006 CET
From Progressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Unemployment Bill
MessageYou're so naive MEP. Afraid to admit your economic policies are a failure. Its shameful that you have the word "economic" in your party name.

Date02:21:44, July 19, 2006 CET
From Modern Economic Party of Cobura
ToDebating the Unemployment Bill
Messageoh yes because i'm going to listen to the PCP who have made it openly clear that they despire our party and would do anything to get rid of us.

Date12:05:24, July 19, 2006 CET
From Tokundskí Nacionalisti
ToDebating the Unemployment Bill
MessageAfter reading that satement, we love the PCP, although we shall vote against this for now.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 225

no
    

Total Seats: 275

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731

    Random quote: "If man asks for many laws, it is only because he is sure that his neighbor needs them; privately he is an unphilosophical anarchist, and thinks laws in his own case superfluous." - Will Durant

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 79