We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: State Pensions
Details
Submitted by[?]: Better Tomorrow Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2259
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state does not operate a pension system. Individuals must save up for retirement on their own.
Current: The state operates a compulsory, public pension system.
Proposed: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:07:42, July 25, 2006 CET | From | Federalists Party | To | Debating the State Pensions |
| Message | There is that word compulsory again. What do you guys have against choice anyway? |
| Date | 17:26:24, July 25, 2006 CET | From | Better Tomorrow Party | To | Debating the State Pensions |
| Message | Why would you prefer to let old people live in poverty? |
| Date | 17:06:02, July 26, 2006 CET | From | Federalists Party | To | Debating the State Pensions |
| Message | We fail to see how FORCING people into a system YOU want them in, necessitates senior citizens living in poverty. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 191 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 309 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
| Random quote: "It is vain to talk of the interest of the community, without understanding what is the interest of the individual" - Jeremy Bentham |