We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Food and beverage labeling regulations.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Markovian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2261
Description[?]:
| Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Food and beverage labeling regulations.
Old value:: There are no laws concerning food and beverage labeling.
Current: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Proposed: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:26:46, July 25, 2006 CET | From | Unwritten Future Collective | To | Debating the Food and beverage labeling regulations. |
| Message | Yes! |
| Date | 13:10:52, July 25, 2006 CET | From | Capitalist Party of Egelion | To | Debating the Food and beverage labeling regulations. |
| Message | No. You're taking away a companies freedom then! (Don't forget a proposal) |
| Date | 21:01:30, July 26, 2006 CET | From | Polaris Party | To | Debating the Food and beverage labeling regulations. |
| Message | Agreed, support. |
| Date | 11:37:08, July 27, 2006 CET | From | Unwritten Future Collective | To | Debating the Food and beverage labeling regulations. |
| Message | The only liberty that can be justified taking is that of a corporation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 335 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 359 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 56 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "I bet their mothers don't love them. Many Trigunian women are so cold. I mean it's a racist hellhole in parts." - Tirza Sommer, former Dorvish politician |