Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5476
Next month in: 03:22:24
Server time: 12:37:35, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): JWDL | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2260

Details

Submitted by[?]: Pro Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2261

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:16:40, July 26, 2006 CET
From Pro Freedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2260
Messageok Commie wants Foreign affairs, he gets it.

Cheesecake has to be in charge of food... I mean really who else would you put there?

Date18:46:18, July 28, 2006 CET
From Pro Freedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2260
MessageHow the heck did this fail??????? I think there's a bug in the system!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 560

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 190


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "Civil disobedience. . . is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. . Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem." - Howard Zinn

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58