Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 01:01:14
Server time: 10:58:45, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: GP Company Recruitment Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Gnazenal Phr'unt

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2263

Description[?]:

Businesses, schools and the armed forces know what is best for them, let them control their own recruitment policies.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:54:56, July 29, 2006 CET
FromBlack People's Party
ToDebating the GP Company Recruitment Bill
MessageCan't support...businesses might have a chance to become racist.

Date01:20:22, July 30, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the GP Company Recruitment Bill
MessageDon't support either.

Date04:54:35, July 30, 2006 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the GP Company Recruitment Bill
MessageStrongly supported. If companies want to offer affirmative action to women or minorities, let them, it's none of the government's business.

Date18:55:44, July 31, 2006 CET
FromGnazenal Phr'unt
ToDebating the GP Company Recruitment Bill
MessageBPP, no company is going to go out of its way to choose the worst worker, whatever their race. If blacks are clever enough they will be fine. Can't quite understand why libertarians would be against however.

Date19:37:18, July 31, 2006 CET
FromBlack People's Party
ToDebating the GP Company Recruitment Bill
MessageBut they have a chance to....

Date01:38:47, August 01, 2006 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the GP Company Recruitment Bill
MessagePositive discrimination/affirmative action is designed to help black people, anyway. Why would the Black People's party want affirmative action banned?

Date02:00:43, August 01, 2006 CET
FromWhite People's Party
ToDebating the GP Company Recruitment Bill
Messagequit usin yer fancy "logic" on us!

Date12:07:55, August 01, 2006 CET
FromGnazenal Phr'unt
ToDebating the GP Company Recruitment Bill
MessageTis true though, currently no company can operate pro-black or pro-women recruiting policies.

Date11:52:10, August 03, 2006 CET
FromGnazenal Phr'unt
ToDebating the GP Company Recruitment Bill
MessageNot that we'd want them too.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 524

no
  

Total Seats: 177

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols.

    Random quote: "In politics, you have your word and your friends; go back on either and you're dead." - Morton C. Blackwell

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 70