We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence (Contractors) Bill 2262
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2263
Description[?]:
We cannot see any reason to keep armaments as a state monopoly, as long as the private alternatives are properly regulated. In any case, the export of arms remains tightly controlled by the government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns all defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:36:24, August 01, 2006 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Defence (Contractors) Bill 2262 |
Message | We do not support allowing private organizations to make a profit off of constructing weaponry for war. This opens up many and various moral quandries and is bad for our nation in the long run. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 341 | ||
no | Total Seats: 260 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "I think the environment should be put in the category of our national security. Defense of our resources is just as important as defense abroad. Otherwise, what is there to defend?" - Robert Redford |