We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom to propose a Cabinet II
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2072
Description[?]:
| A more democractic system is what we strive for! Dont fight against it! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:39:38, June 26, 2005 CET | From | National Democratic Party | To | Debating the Freedom to propose a Cabinet II |
| Message | i abstain |
| Date | 11:01:59, June 26, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Freedom to propose a Cabinet II |
| Message | Keeping consistant with previous positions, we vote no. |
| Date | 19:35:38, June 26, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Freedom to propose a Cabinet II |
| Message | Why do you abstain? that is the same thing as voting no, Which is not cool, man! |
| Date | 19:59:57, June 26, 2005 CET | From | National Democratic Party | To | Debating the Freedom to propose a Cabinet II |
| Message | OOC: I abstain because I think something should be reserved for the HOS until the HOS gets other duties. |
| Date | 07:35:03, June 27, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Freedom to propose a Cabinet II |
| Message | If a party feels this is something that should be reserved for the HoS then it should vote no on this bill, if a party feels that the power of cabinet proposal should be devolved to all parties then it should vote yes, if it is neutral it should abstain. |
| Date | 16:46:43, June 27, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Freedom to propose a Cabinet II |
| Message | The HOS already has the power over our armed forces, What more do you want? |
| Date | 18:04:42, June 27, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Freedom to propose a Cabinet II |
| Message | wish the CRIP had voted... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 139 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 125 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 68 |
| Random fact: http://www.fantasynamegenerators.com and http://www.behindthename.com/random are great resources for coming up with character names from unfamiliar cultures. |
| Random quote: "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Jean Chretien (describing the level of proof about weapons of mass destruction that Canada required to join the Iraq War) |